e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
|
|
Commission File
No. 1-2960 |
Newpark Resources, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
72-1123385
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
3850 N. Causeway, Suite 1770
Metairie, Louisiana
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
70002
(Zip Code) |
(504) 838-8222
(Registrants telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes þ No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as of the
latest practicable date.
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 87,237,856 shares at July 28, 2005.
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED
June 30, 2005
Forward-Looking Statements
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. The words anticipates, believes, estimates, expects, plans, intends
and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements but are not the
exclusive means of identifying them. These forward-looking statements reflect the current views of
our management; however, various risks, uncertainties and contingencies, including the risks
identified below, could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially
from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements, including the success or failure of our
efforts to implement our business strategy.
We assume no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks,
2
uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this report might not
occur.
Among the risks and uncertainties that could cause future events and results to differ
materially from those anticipated by us in the forward-looking statements included in this report
are the following:
|
|
|
A material decline in the level of oil and gas exploration and production, to which
we refer as E&P, and any reduction in the industrys willingness to spend capital on
environmental and oilfield services could adversely affect the demand for our services; |
|
|
|
|
Material changes in oil and gas prices, expectations about future prices, the cost
of exploring for, producing and delivering oil and gas, the discovery rate of new oil
and gas reserves and the ability of oil and gas companies to raise capital could
adversely affect the demand for our services; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in domestic and international political, military, regulatory and economic
conditions may adversely affect the demand for oil and gas or production volumes; |
|
|
|
|
A rescission or relaxation of government regulations affecting E&P waste disposal
could reduce the demand for our services and reduce our revenues and income. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in existing regulations could require us to change the way we do business,
which may have a material adverse affect on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows; |
|
|
|
|
Our patents or other proprietary technology may not prevent our competitors from
developing substantially similar technology, which would reduce any competitive
advantages we may have from these patents and proprietary technology; |
|
|
|
|
We may not be able to keep pace with the continual and rapid technological
developments that characterize the market for our products and services, and our
failure to do so may result in our loss of market share; |
|
|
|
|
We face intense competition in our existing markets and expect to face competition
in any markets into which we seek to expand, which may put pressure on our ability to
maintain our current market share and may limit our ability to expand our market share
or enter into new markets; |
|
|
|
|
Our acquisitions or new market expansions may not achieve sales and profitability
levels that justify our investment in them, which could result in these businesses
placing downward pressure on our margins, our disposing of these businesses at a loss
or potential impairment of goodwill related to these businesses; |
|
|
|
|
The demand for our services may be adversely affected by shortages of critical
supplies or equipment in the oil and gas industry and personnel trained to operate this
equipment; |
|
|
|
|
We may not be successful in gaining acceptance or market share for new products and
services, including Bravo mats and our newly licensed proprietary water treatment
technology; |
|
|
|
|
We may not be able to maintain the necessary permits to operate our non-hazardous
waste disposal wells or we may not be able to successfully compete in this market; |
3
|
|
|
Adverse weather conditions could disrupt drilling operations and reduce the demand
for our services; |
|
|
|
|
We may fail to comply with any of the numerous federal, state and local laws,
regulations and policies that govern environmental protection, zoning and other matters
applicable to our business, or these regulations and policies may change, and we may
face fines or other penalties if we fail to comply with existing or new regulations, or
be forced to make significant capital expenditures or changes to our operations; |
|
|
|
|
Our business exposes us to potential environmental and regulatory liability, and we
could be required to pay substantial amounts with respect to these liabilities,
including the costs to clean up and close contaminated sites; |
|
|
|
|
We may not have adequate insurance for potential liabilities, and any significant
liability not covered by insurance or in excess of our coverage limits could have a
material adverse affect on our financial condition; |
|
|
|
|
Our international operations are subject to uncertainties which could limit our
ability to expand or reduce the revenues and profitability of these operations,
including difficulties and costs associated with complying with a wide variety of
complex foreign laws, treaties and regulations, unexpected changes in regulatory
environments, inadequate protection of intellectual property in foreign countries,
legal uncertainties, timing delays and expenses associated with tariffs, export
licenses and other trade barriers, among other risks; |
|
|
|
|
Any increases in interest rates under our credit facility, either as a result of
increases in the prime or LIBOR rates or as a result of changes in our funded debt to
cash flow ratio, would increase our cost of borrowing and have an adverse affect on our
consolidated financial statements; and |
|
|
|
|
We may not be able to retire or refinance our long-term debt at or before its
maturity, whether due to conditions in financial markets or our own financial condition
at that future time. We also cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain any
replacement long-term financing on terms as favorable to us as under our current
financing. |
For further information regarding these and other factors, risks and uncertainties affecting
us, we refer you to the risk factors set forth in the Prospectus included in our Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed on May 8, 2002 (File No. 333-87840), to the section entitled
Forward-Looking Statements on page 17 of that Prospectus and to our periodic reports filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4
Newpark Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,506 |
|
|
$ |
7,022 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance of $735
in 2005 and $3,260 in 2004 |
|
|
118,401 |
|
|
|
100,587 |
|
Notes and other receivables |
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
7,321 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
80,812 |
|
|
|
84,044 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
11,508 |
|
|
|
12,501 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
14,135 |
|
|
|
13,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
241,978 |
|
|
|
224,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net of
accumulated depreciation |
|
|
239,760 |
|
|
|
210,514 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
116,289 |
|
|
|
117,414 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,063 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
19,106 |
|
|
|
15,355 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,641 |
|
|
|
18,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
622,774 |
|
|
$ |
590,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign bank lines of credit |
|
$ |
10,102 |
|
|
$ |
8,017 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
10,404 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
41,672 |
|
|
|
38,822 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
32,320 |
|
|
|
26,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
94,498 |
|
|
|
78,745 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
193,372 |
|
|
|
186,286 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, 80,000 outstanding |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,
84,346,516 and 84,021,351 shares
issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
844 |
|
|
840 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
404,130 |
|
|
|
402,248 |
|
Unearned restricted stock compensation |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
8,199 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(98,132 |
) |
|
|
(107,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
332,365 |
|
|
|
322,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
622,774 |
|
|
$ |
590,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Newpark Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Three and Six Month Periods Ended June 30
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
141,496 |
|
|
$ |
104,633 |
|
|
$ |
270,549 |
|
|
$ |
208,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
126,677 |
|
|
|
97,096 |
|
|
|
241,774 |
|
|
|
192,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
7,537 |
|
|
|
28,775 |
|
|
|
16,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
12,194 |
|
|
|
5,118 |
|
|
|
24,075 |
|
|
|
11,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency (gain) loss |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(1,016 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
4,195 |
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
8,276 |
|
|
|
7,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
7,771 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
15,914 |
|
|
|
5,233 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
5,746 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
10,168 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common
and common equivalent shares |
|
$ |
4,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
$ |
9,718 |
|
|
$ |
2,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income per common
and common equivalent share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Newpark Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the Three and Six Month Periods Ended June 30
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,054 |
|
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
|
$ |
10,168 |
|
|
$ |
3,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(1,698 |
) |
|
|
(1,727 |
) |
|
|
(2,323 |
) |
|
|
(2,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,356 |
|
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
|
$ |
7,845 |
|
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Newpark Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Month Periods Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands ) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,168 |
|
|
$ |
3,245 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,740 |
|
|
|
10,158 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,365 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,029 |
|
Decrease
(increase) in accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
(15,057 |
) |
|
|
575 |
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories |
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
|
(1,255 |
) |
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(4,715 |
) |
|
|
(4,552 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
(8,123 |
) |
Increase in accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
9,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
19,257 |
|
|
|
18,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(19,997 |
) |
|
|
(7,265 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
Acquisition, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment received on former shipyard operation note receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(20,335 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings (payments) on lines of credit |
|
|
4,643 |
|
|
|
(14,123 |
) |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
(3,968 |
) |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends paid in cash |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and ESPP |
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
(15,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
5,484 |
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
7,022 |
|
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
12,506 |
|
|
$ |
7,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
8
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Interim Financial Statements
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of Newpark Resources,
Inc. (Newpark) as of June 30, 2005, the results of its operations for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and its cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30,
2005 and 2004. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These interim financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 2004 audited financial statements
and related notes filed in Newparks Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the entire year. We have reclassified certain amounts previously reported to conform
with the presentation at June 30, 2005.
Note 2 Earnings Per Share
The following table presents the reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for
calculating income per share in accordance with the disclosure requirements of Financial Accounting
Standards (FAS) 128:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Income applicable to common and common equivalent shares |
|
$ |
4,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
84,210 |
|
|
|
83,820 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average number of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
84,588 |
|
|
|
84,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income applicable to common and
common equivalent shares |
|
$ |
.06 |
|
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Income applicable to common and common equivalent shares |
|
$ |
9,718 |
|
|
$ |
2,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
84,146 |
|
|
|
83,361 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average number of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
84,449 |
|
|
|
83,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income applicable to common and
common equivalent shares |
|
$ |
.12 |
|
|
$ |
.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share was calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. For the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2005, Newpark had dilutive stock options and warrants of approximately 3.1 million shares
and 2.8 million shares, respectively, which were assumed to be exercised using the treasury stock
method. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004, Newpark had dilutive stock
options and warrants of approximately 1.9 million shares and 2.0 million shares, respectively,
which were assumed to be exercised using the treasury stock method. The resulting net effects of
stock options and warrants were used in calculating diluted income per share for these periods.
Options and warrants to purchase a total of approximately 6.3 million shares and 6.7 million
shares, respectively, of common stock were outstanding during the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2005, but were not included in the computation of diluted income per share because they
were anti-dilutive. Options and warrants to purchase a total of approximately 7.8 million shares
and 8.0 million shares of common stock were outstanding during the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2004, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted income per
share because they were anti-dilutive.
The net effects of the assumed conversion of preferred stock have been excluded from the
computation of diluted income per share for all periods presented because the effect would be
anti-dilutive.
Note 3 Stock-Based Compensation
At June 30, 2005, Newpark maintained six stock-based compensation plans, including four stock
option plans and two long-term incentive plans. Newpark applies Accounting Principles Board
Opinion 25 (APB 25) and related Interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation
plans. In accordance with this guidance, no compensation cost has been recognized for Newparks
stock option plans as the exercise price of all stock options granted thereunder is equal to the
fair value at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recorded for Newparks long-term
incentive plans. Had compensation costs for all of Newparks stock-based compensation plans been
determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the
10
method of FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Newparks net
income and net income per share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Income applicable to common and common equivalent shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
4,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
Add recorded stock-based compensation expense,
net of related taxes |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Deduct stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related taxes |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income |
|
$ |
4,692 |
|
|
$ |
972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
.06 |
|
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma |
|
$ |
.06 |
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
.06 |
|
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma |
|
$ |
.06 |
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Income applicable to common and common equivalent shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
9,718 |
|
|
$ |
2,757 |
|
Add recorded stock-based compensation expense,
net of related taxes |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Deduct stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related taxes |
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
(849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income |
|
$ |
9,459 |
|
|
$ |
2,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
.12 |
|
|
$ |
.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
.11 |
|
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
.12 |
|
|
$ |
.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
.11 |
|
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2004, Newpark modified the terms of non-director and non-executive officer stock
options to accelerate the vesting of out-of-the-money options. This resulted in a decrease of approximately $187,000 and
$484,000,
11
respectively, in the pro forma after-tax expense that otherwise would have been reported for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005 presented above.
Note 4 Accounts Receivable
Included in accounts receivable at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
$ |
100,405 |
|
|
$ |
86,152 |
|
Unbilled revenues |
|
|
18,731 |
|
|
|
17,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross trade receivables |
|
|
119,136 |
|
|
|
103,847 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(3,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trade receivables |
|
$ |
118,401 |
|
|
$ |
100,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts during the six months ended June 30, 2005 is principally due to the
write-off of accounts deemed to be uncollectible.
Note 5 Inventory
Newparks inventory consisted of the following items at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Finished goods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite mats |
|
$ |
7,474 |
|
|
$ |
12,824 |
|
Raw materials and components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling fluids raw material and components |
|
|
66,230 |
|
|
|
63,602 |
|
Logs |
|
|
5,115 |
|
|
|
5,121 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total raw materials and components |
|
|
73,338 |
|
|
|
71,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory |
|
$ |
80,812 |
|
|
$ |
84,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Acquisitions
On April 18, 2005, Newpark acquired OLS Consulting Services, Inc. (OLS) in exchange for a cash payment of $1.3 million,
including $400,000 which was allocated to the settlement of litigation (see Note 10). The principal assets of OLS included
patents licensed to The Loma Company, LLC (LOMA) for use in the manufacture of composite mats, its 51% membership interest in
LOMA and a note receivable from LOMA. As a result of the acquisition of OLS, Newpark, through two of its subsidiaries, owns all
of the outstanding equity interests in LOMA.
The acquisition of OLS and consolidation of LOMA were accounted for following the principles of FAS 141. The purchase
price, including approximately $57,000 of acquisition
12
costs, was allocated to the net assets of OLS and LOMA based on preliminary
estimates of fair value at the date of acquisition as shown in the table below (in thousands). Estimates are considered
preliminary principally pending final income tax amounts which affect the recording of deferred taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
467 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
15,633 |
|
Intangible
assets patents (10-18 year lives) |
|
|
4,534 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Current and long-term debt |
|
|
(5,284 |
) |
Payable to Newpark |
|
|
(14,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash purchase price, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In consolidation, the payable to Newpark was eliminated primarily against other assets.
Note 7 New Accounting Standards
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FAS 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,
(FAS 123(R)) which is a revision of FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. FAS 123(R) supersedes Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FAS 95, Statement of Cash
Flows. Generally, the approach in FAS 123(R) is similar to the approach described in FAS 123. However, FAS 123(R) requires that
all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the income statement based on
their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. FAS 123(R) permits adoption of its requirements using one
of two methods: (1) a modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date of
FAS 123(R) (a) based on the requirement of FAS 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after that effective date and (b) based
on the requirements of FAS 123 for all awards granted prior to the effective date of FAS 123(R) that remain unvested on the
effective date; and (2) a modified retrospective method which includes the requirements of the modified prospective method
previously described, but also permits restatement of prior periods based on the amounts previously reported in pro forma
disclosures under FAS 123. Newpark currently plans to adopt FAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method and to continue
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of its stock options. On April 14, 2005, the Securities
and Exchange Commission announced amended compliance dates for SFAS 123(R) and the new rules now require Newpark to adopt FAS
123(R) starting with its first quarter of its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006.
As permitted by FAS 123, Newpark currently accounts for stock-based compensation using APB 25s intrinsic value method
and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of FAS 123(R) may
have a material impact on Newparks results of operations. However, the ultimate impact of adoption of FAS 123(R) cannot be
predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. If Newpark had adopted FAS
123(R) in prior periods, the impact for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004,
13
would have approximated the impact of FAS 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note 3.
In November 2004, the FASB issued FAS 151, Inventory Costs-an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, to clarify the
accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage). It requires
that these items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet a criterion of so abnormal. FAS 151 is
effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Management has not yet determined the
impact that adoption of FAS 151 will have on Newparks financial results.
Note 8 Segment Data
Summarized financial information concerning Newparks reportable segments is shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenues by segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluids sales and engineering |
|
$ |
96,573 |
|
|
$ |
58,358 |
|
|
$ |
178,262 |
|
|
$ |
124,593 |
|
Mat and integrated services |
|
|
28,986 |
|
|
|
31,199 |
|
|
|
60,964 |
|
|
|
52,093 |
|
E&P waste disposal |
|
|
15,937 |
|
|
|
15,076 |
|
|
|
31,323 |
|
|
|
32,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
141,496 |
|
|
$ |
104,633 |
|
|
$ |
270,549 |
|
|
$ |
208,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluids sales and engineering |
|
$ |
9,654 |
|
|
$ |
2,481 |
|
|
$ |
16,429 |
|
|
$ |
8,800 |
|
Mat and integrated services |
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
8,797 |
|
|
|
3,064 |
|
E&P waste disposal |
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
3,549 |
|
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
7,537 |
|
|
|
28,775 |
|
|
|
16,233 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
12,194 |
|
|
$ |
5,118 |
|
|
$ |
24,075 |
|
|
$ |
11,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The figures above are shown net of intersegment transfers.
Note 9 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
The supplemental condensed consolidating financial information should be read in conjunction with the notes to these consolidated
financial statements and has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations for condensed financial information. The
supplemental condensed consolidated financial information does not include all disclosures included in annual financial
statements; nevertheless, Newpark believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. Certain reclassifications were made to conform all of the financial information to the financial presentation on a
consolidated basis. The principal eliminating entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries, intercompany balances and
intercompany revenues and
14
expenses. The allocation of the consolidated income tax provision was made using the with and without
allocation method.
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
|
$ |
4,151 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,506 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,591 |
|
|
|
28,538 |
|
|
|
(2,728 |
) |
|
|
118,401 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,792 |
|
|
|
20,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,812 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
|
5,649 |
|
|
|
11,092 |
|
|
|
(2,382 |
) |
|
|
30,259 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
23,053 |
|
|
|
160,234 |
|
|
|
63,801 |
|
|
|
(5,110 |
) |
|
|
241,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
470,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
9,613 |
|
|
|
223,080 |
|
|
|
7,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,760 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,114 |
|
|
|
21,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,289 |
|
Identifiable intangibles, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,847 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,106 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
21,870 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
(19,271 |
) |
|
|
5,641 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
525,055 |
|
|
$ |
497,135 |
|
|
$ |
95,484 |
|
|
$ |
(494,900 |
) |
|
$ |
622,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign bank lines of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,102 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,102 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
8,234 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,404 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
25,694 |
|
|
|
17,246 |
|
|
|
(2,728 |
) |
|
|
41,672 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
5,740 |
|
|
|
15,430 |
|
|
|
12,877 |
|
|
|
(1,727 |
) |
|
|
32,320 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
9,317 |
|
|
|
49,358 |
|
|
|
40,278 |
|
|
|
(4,455 |
) |
|
|
94,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
182,636 |
|
|
|
6,538 |
|
|
|
17,838 |
|
|
|
(13,640 |
) |
|
|
193,372 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
(3,055 |
) |
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
12,749 |
|
|
|
(13,556 |
) |
|
|
844 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
404,130 |
|
|
|
427,957 |
|
|
|
21,067 |
|
|
|
(449,024 |
) |
|
|
404,130 |
|
Unearned restricted stock |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
(3,152 |
) |
|
|
5,876 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(98,132 |
) |
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(8,018 |
) |
|
|
(98,132 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
332,365 |
|
|
|
438,782 |
|
|
|
34,968 |
|
|
|
(473,750 |
) |
|
|
332,365 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
525,055 |
|
|
$ |
497,135 |
|
|
$ |
95,484 |
|
|
$ |
(494,900 |
) |
|
$ |
622,774 |
|
|
|
|
15
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Only |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
3,868 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,022 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,651 |
|
|
|
20,096 |
|
|
|
(2,160 |
) |
|
|
100,587 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,158 |
|
|
|
18,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,044 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
15,814 |
|
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
8,967 |
|
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
33,097 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
17,768 |
|
|
|
157,809 |
|
|
|
51,817 |
|
|
|
(2,644 |
) |
|
|
224,750 |
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
461,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(461,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
|
200,373 |
|
|
|
6,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,514 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,114 |
|
|
|
22,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,414 |
|
Identifiable intangibles, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,715 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,355 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
26,011 |
|
|
|
13,068 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
(17,774 |
) |
|
|
22,081 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
509,270 |
|
|
$ |
479,079 |
|
|
$ |
83,860 |
|
|
$ |
(482,095 |
) |
|
$ |
590,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign bank lines of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,017 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,017 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
30,868 |
|
|
|
9,158 |
|
|
|
(2,160 |
) |
|
|
38,822 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
5,736 |
|
|
|
11,017 |
|
|
|
10,606 |
|
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
26,875 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
7,942 |
|
|
|
45,633 |
|
|
|
27,814 |
|
|
|
(2,644 |
) |
|
|
78,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
177,861 |
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
18,372 |
|
|
|
(14,030 |
) |
|
|
186,286 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
(1,104 |
) |
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
12,750 |
|
|
|
(13,557 |
) |
|
|
840 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
402,248 |
|
|
|
436,133 |
|
|
|
21,397 |
|
|
|
(457,530 |
) |
|
|
402,248 |
|
Unearned restricted stock |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(472 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
(3,740 |
) |
|
|
8,199 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(107,850 |
) |
|
|
(6,473 |
) |
|
|
(2,933 |
) |
|
|
9,406 |
|
|
|
(107,850 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
322,965 |
|
|
|
430,467 |
|
|
|
34,954 |
|
|
|
(465,421 |
) |
|
|
322,965 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
509,270 |
|
|
$ |
479,079 |
|
|
$ |
83,860 |
|
|
$ |
(482,095 |
) |
|
$ |
590,114 |
|
|
|
|
16
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
118,887 |
|
|
$ |
22,609 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
141,496 |
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,884 |
|
|
|
21,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,003 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
2,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(2,478 |
) |
|
|
14,003 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,195 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(6,263 |
) |
|
|
13,837 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(2,311 |
) |
|
|
4,994 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
9,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,054 |
|
|
$ |
8,843 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
(9,006 |
) |
|
$ |
5,054 |
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
90,102 |
|
|
$ |
14,531 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
104,633 |
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,576 |
|
|
|
15,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,526 |
|
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(2,258 |
) |
|
|
8,526 |
|
|
|
(1,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(982 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
3,329 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(4,763 |
) |
|
|
8,596 |
|
|
|
(1,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(1,668 |
) |
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
4,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
|
$ |
5,369 |
|
|
$ |
(707 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,662 |
) |
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
222,731 |
|
|
$ |
47,818 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
270,549 |
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,553 |
|
|
|
45,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,178 |
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(4,437 |
) |
|
|
26,178 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
7,486 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,276 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(11,963 |
) |
|
|
25,810 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(4,307 |
) |
|
|
9,268 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,746 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
17,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,168 |
|
|
$ |
16,542 |
|
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
(17,824 |
) |
|
$ |
10,168 |
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
169,155 |
|
|
$ |
39,787 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
208,942 |
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,219 |
|
|
|
37,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,936 |
|
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
4,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(4,588 |
) |
|
|
13,936 |
|
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(995 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
6,726 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,124 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(10,458 |
) |
|
|
13,936 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(3,661 |
) |
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
10,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,245 |
|
|
$ |
9,077 |
|
|
$ |
965 |
|
|
$ |
(10,042 |
) |
|
$ |
3,245 |
|
|
|
|
18
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
$ |
(12,743 |
) |
|
$ |
29,006 |
|
|
$ |
2,994 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, net of
sales proceeds |
|
|
(2,816 |
) |
|
|
(15,479 |
) |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,495 |
) |
Acquisition, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(840 |
) |
Investments |
|
|
14,521 |
|
|
|
(10,952 |
) |
|
|
(3,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,865 |
|
|
|
(26,431 |
) |
|
|
(4,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,335 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings (payments on)
lines of credit, notes payable
and long-term debt |
|
|
5,641 |
|
|
|
(2,573 |
) |
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,530 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
(2,573 |
) |
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
|
5,199 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,484 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
3,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,022 |
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
7,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
|
$ |
4,151 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,506 |
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
$ |
(6,847 |
) |
|
$ |
26,334 |
|
|
$ |
(1,407 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, net of sales
proceeds |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
(4,754 |
) |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,682 |
) |
Investments |
|
|
19,484 |
|
|
|
(20,947 |
) |
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments received on note receivable |
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,476 |
|
|
|
(25,701 |
) |
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings (payments on) lines
of credit, notes payable and
long-term debt |
|
|
(15,995 |
) |
|
|
(1,613 |
) |
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,259 |
) |
Other |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,965 |
) |
|
|
(1,613 |
) |
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,229 |
) |
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
2,664 |
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
2,842 |
|
|
$ |
(1,340 |
) |
|
$ |
6,464 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,966 |
|
|
19
Note 10 Legal Matters
Newpark, through a consolidated subsidiary, purchased composite mats from
The Loma Company, LLC (LOMA), which manufactured the mats under an exclusive license
granted by OLS Consulting Services, Inc. (OLS). Newpark, through a separate
consolidated subsidiary, owned 49% of LOMA and OLS held the remaining 51% interest.
OLS had granted Newpark an exclusive license to use and sell these composite mats. On April 18, 2005, Newpark acquired OLS in exchange for a cash payment of $1.3 million, including $400,000 of which was allocated to the settlement of litigation previously filed by OLS and LOMA against Newpark, certain of its officers and subsidiaries. The principal assets of OLS included the patents licensed to LOMA for use in the manufacture of the mats, a note receivable from LOMA and its 51% membership interest in LOMA. As a result of the acquisition of OLS, Newpark, through two of its subsidiaries, owns all of the outstanding equity interests in LOMA and the parties and their affiliates mutually dismissed all previously pending litigation, which has been previously described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. A motion to dismiss the LOMA bankruptcy proceedings was heard on April 19, 2005 and such proceedings were dismissed.
In addition, Newpark and its subsidiaries are involved in litigation and other claims or assessments on matters arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, any recovery or liability in these matters should not have a material effect on Newparks consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 11 Subsequent Events
Subsequent to June 30, 2005 the holder of Series B Preferred Stock converted a total of 60,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms of the agreements pursuant to which the Series B Preferred Stock was issued. The converted shares of Series B Stock had a total stated value of $15.0 million. In connection with this conversion, Newpark issued a total of 2.6 million shares of its common stock, valued at the conversion price of $5.79, and cancelled the 60,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
20
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and
capital resources should be read together with our Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
and Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as well as our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Operating Environment and Recent Developments
Our operating results depend in large measure on oil and gas drilling activity levels in the
markets we serve, as well as on the depth of drilling, which governs the revenue potential of each
well. These levels, in turn, depend on oil and gas commodities pricing, inventory levels and
product demand. Rig count data is the most widely accepted indicator of drilling activity. Key
average rig count data for the last six quarters is listed in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Q04 |
|
2Q04 |
|
3Q04 |
|
4Q04 |
|
1Q05 |
|
2Q05 |
|
|
|
U.S Rig Count |
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
Canadian Rig Count |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
Derived from Baker Hughes Incorporated |
Our primary markets include: (1) South Louisiana Land, (2) Texas Railroad Commission Districts
2 and 3, (3) Louisiana and Texas Inland Waters, (4) Offshore Gulf of Mexico, (5) the U.S. central
region (including the U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Oklahoma and West Texas), (6) Canada and (7)
areas surrounding the Mediterranean Sea.
Key Developments
Our primary Gulf Coast oilfield market accounted for approximately 48% of second quarter 2005
revenues, compared to 50% of second quarter 2004 revenues. As recently as 1997, the Gulf Coast
oilfield market accounted for 97% of total revenues. The overall decline in the percentage of Gulf
Coast revenues over the last several years is the result of managements strategy to diversify its
revenue base and relatively flat Gulf Coast market activity. While we have recently experienced an
increase in Gulf Coast oilfield market activity, we believe that the majority of our growth will
come from other markets and new product offerings in the markets we serve.
Over the last several years we have developed many new products and product enhancements in
each of our business segments. We have invested a significant amount of financial and human
resources in developing these new products. A large portion of these investments in product
developments and enhancements has been made during an extended period of market stagnation in the
Gulf Coast market. We believe that these investments will be a key driver of future revenue
growth.
Fluids Sales and Engineering. We continue to develop a position in the drilling fluids
market by expanding our customer base, drawing upon increasing acceptance of our proprietary
DeepDrill and FlexDrill technologies. We have introduced the New-100
21
oil-based drilling fluid system in the western Canadian market and are beginning to introduce
it in the U.S. central region. This fluid system incorporates a principal component from the
DeepDrill family to replace salt, which solves some of the environmental problems associated
with oil-based fluids and improves drilling performance. This fluid has demonstrated up to 30%
increased penetration rates on deep wells and is rapidly gaining market acceptance. Based on
customer acceptance of our technology and service capability, we anticipate introducing these
products and services in several additional foreign markets.
We believe that certain of these new products improve the economics of the drilling process
and will make it easier for our customers to comply with increasingly strict environmental
regulations affecting their drilling operations.
During 2004 our product costs increased across most of the U.S. markets that we serve.
Specifically, in the second half of 2004, the ocean freight cost to ship barite from our foreign
suppliers increased significantly. These cost increases were only partially offset by price
increases to our customers in the first six months of 2005, due to market conditions and existing
contractual arrangements. We are continuing to increase prices to our customers as contracts are
renewed. The impact of these cost increases should be fully offset by the end of 2005 through
price increases to our customers and more favorable transportation arrangements.
Mat and Integrated Services. During the first six months of 2005 pricing for mat
installation and re-rentals in the U.S. oilfield market continued to improve. We believe that
prices will further improve throughout the remainder of 2005 as a result of expected increases in
Gulf Coast drilling activity.
Beginning in late 2004, we implemented cost reduction measures in this segment, principally
related to resizing our rental fleet, reducing infrastructure, outsourcing transportation and other
services and reducing payroll. In connection with resizing our rental fleet, we anticipate
reductions in our depreciation costs, primarily in the second half of 2005, due to the completion
of depreciation on portions of our wooden mat fleet that we do not intend to fully replace.
We continue to rent wooden mats in the Gulf Coast oilfield market and to sell them in the
western Canadian oilfield market. Wooden mats are becoming more difficult to obtain due to reduced
supplies of suitable hardwoods. Our Batson Mill operation provides us access to hardwoods to meet
our business requirements.
We also continue to develop the worldwide market for our Dura-Base(R) composite mat system.
Our marketing efforts for this product remain focused in eight principal markets, including Canada,
Alaska and the Arctic, Russia, the Middle East, South America, Mexico, Indonesia and the U.S.
utilities markets. We have completed sales in all of these markets.
Over the past several years of marketing this product and evaluating customer acceptance, we
have gained valuable information and have modified our marketing and product development strategies
accordingly. These strategies include the development of several markets outside our traditional
oilfield market. These new markets include infrastructure construction applications, particularly
for maintenance and upgrades of
22
electric utility transmission lines in response to increasing demand for electricity in many
parts of the country, and for other infrastructure construction applications and temporary roads
for movement of oversized or unusually heavy loads.
We
recently completed the acquisition of the third-party ownership in
our Dura-Base® mat
manufacturing facility and are now in a position to implement several improvements to that product
family based on our experience with rental and sales of this product.
We believe our new lightweight Bravo Mat system will substantially broaden the
opportunities for mat sales. This new mat system has been designed specifically for personnel
applications, including temporary event surfaces, walkways and tent flooring, and is likely to have
many other applications.
E&P Waste Disposal. In the first quarter of 2005, changes we made in our recycling
processes in the Gulf Coast temporarily reduced our capacity in this market, resulting in a decline
in waste volume received in the quarter. With the process changes in place, we are now back to
full capacity and expect to see an increase in waste volumes received in this market, consistent
with the recent improvement in drilling activity, principally in the inland barge market.
We have recently announced the formation of Newpark Environmental Water Solutions, LLC
(NEWS), through which we intend to commercialize the ARMEL Activator technology, a proprietary
and patented water treatment technology. The new technology employs principles of sonochemistry to
remove dissolved solids from the wastewater. Where necessary, the technology can be introduced into
conventional treatment processes, rendering those processes much more effective and economical.
During the first quarter of 2005, NEWS took delivery of its first water treatment system, which has
been installed at our Boulder, Wyoming, facility, originally opened in 2003. While still in the
start-up and testing phase of our operating plan, we are producing treated water that meets the
discharge requirements of our permit. This facility will service customers in the Jonah and
Pinedale fields. We expect first revenues for NEWS in the third quarter of 2005.
NEWS was also awarded its first contract for processing produced water from coal bed methane
production near Gillette, Wyoming. We are constructing a facility at that location, with
completion expected in late September 2005.
Other Market Trends
Current long-term industry analyses forecast difficulty in meeting anticipated growing demand
for natural gas. In addition, current gas reserves are being depleted at a rate faster than
replacement through current drilling activities. Many shallow fields in the Gulf Coast market have
been heavily exploited. Improved economics and technology have increased the interest of producers
to drill at greater depths to reach the larger gas reserves. We expect gas drilling activity to be
increasingly associated with deeper, more costly wells. We view this trend as favorable to demand
for product offerings in all of our segments.
23
Current short-term industry forecasts suggest that we could see a slight increase in the
number of rigs active in our primary Gulf Coast market, but this increase is expected to develop
slowly as customers react to the changing risk profile of the market. The number of rigs active in
the offshore and inland water Gulf Coast markets is expected to increase slowly due to a lack of
rigs of adequate capability. We anticipate continued revenue growth in the markets we serve,
driven by increased market penetration of critical, deep water and geologically deeper wells. This
market penetration is the result of our performance and continued success of new products,
including our DeepDrill and FlexDrill families of products.
Results of Operations
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following
table (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
Revenues by segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluids sales and engineering |
|
$ |
96.6 |
|
|
$ |
58.4 |
|
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
Mat and integrated services |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
E&P waste disposal |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
141.5 |
|
|
$ |
104.7 |
|
|
$ |
36.8 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluids sales and engineering |
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
|
284 |
% |
Mat and integrated services |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
E&P waste disposal |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
|
135 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
Revenues by segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluids sales and engineering |
|
$ |
178.2 |
|
|
$ |
124.6 |
|
|
$ |
53.6 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
Mat and integrated services |
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
E&P waste disposal |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
270.5 |
|
|
$ |
209.0 |
|
|
$ |
61.5 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluids sales and engineering |
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
Mat and integrated services |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
E&P waste disposal |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
|
111 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts above are shown net of intersegment transfers.
Quarter Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2004
Fluids Sales and Engineering:
Revenues
Total revenue by region for this segment was as follows for the three months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
|
$ |
16.5 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
U.S. Central |
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Other |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. |
|
|
81.3 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Canada |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
NM |
Mediterranean |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
96.6 |
|
|
$ |
58.4 |
|
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average number of rigs we serviced in the U.S. market increased by 32%, from 150 in
the second quarter of 2004 to 198 in the second quarter of 2005. Average annual revenue per rig in
the U.S. market increased by 23%, from approximately $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2004 to
approximately $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2005 due to an increase in the number of Gulf
Coast inland water rigs serviced, which typically yield higher annual revenues per rig.
25
Revenues in our primary Gulf Coast market for the second quarter of 2005 were 68% higher than
in the prior year. In the Gulf Coast market we serviced an average of 77
rigs in the second quarter of 2005, compared to 53 in the second quarter of 2004, an increase of
45%. The average number of rigs operating in this region increased 17%, from 426 rigs in the
second quarter of 2004 to 500 in the second quarter of 2005. The difference between the increase
in the number of rigs we serviced in this region and the number of rigs active in the region
reflects our market penetration. We have significantly improved our key drilling fluid customer
relationships in this market and believe that those customers will be increasingly active in the
Gulf Coast market during the remainder of the year, though the total number of active rigs is not
expected to increase significantly.
Revenues in the U.S. Central region for the second quarter of 2005 were 48% higher than in the
prior year. In the U.S. Central region we serviced an average of 121 rigs in the second quarter of
2005, compared to 98 in the second quarter of 2004, an increase of 23%. The average number of rigs
operating in this region increased 9%, from 464 rigs in the second quarter of 2004 to 507 in the
second quarter of 2005. The difference between the increase in the number of rigs we serviced in
this region and the number of rigs active in the region reflects our market penetration.
Revenues in the Canadian market increased nearly six-fold during the second quarter of 2005,
compared to the second quarter of 2004. In 2004, the areas within Canada that we principally
serviced experienced extreme weather-related declines compared to 2005 and compared to other areas
in the 2004 Canadian market. In addition, the introduction of our New-100 oil-based drilling fluid
system in the western Canadian market has increased revenues and market share in the northern
portion of this market, which is characterized by deeper drilling and higher revenue per rig.
Revenues in the Mediterranean market increased 25% during the quarter ended June 30, 2005,
compared to the second quarter of 2004. This increase was principally related to increased market
penetration in the North African locations that we service.
Operating Income
Operating income for this segment increased $7.1 million in the second quarter of 2005 on a
$38.2 million increase in revenues, compared to the second quarter of 2004. The operating margin
for this segment in the second quarter of 2005 was 9.9%, compared to 4.3% in the second quarter of
2004. The increase in operating margin was principally attributable to operating leverage in this
segment. In addition, the prior year operating margin was diminished by the significant decline in
Canadian revenues as a result of severe weather conditions in that market.
The increase in operating margin for this segment was partially offset by increased barite
costs that have not been fully recovered through price increases to our customers. More favorable
transportation arrangements have helped to stabilize barite costs. Increases in pricing are
anticipated to recapture these costs in the second half of 2005. We anticipate an increase in the
number of deepwater rigs serviced in the Gulf of Mexico market during the remainder of 2005 which
should continue to improve margins in our Gulf Coast operations. In addition, we anticipate margin
improvements for our New-100 fluid system sold in Canada as this product gains market acceptance.
26
Mat and Integrated Services:
Revenues
Total revenue for this segment consists of the following for the three months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
Installation |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
)% |
Re-rental |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. oilfield mat rental |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-oilfield mat rental |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Integrated services and other |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Canadian mat sales |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Composite mat sales |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29.0 |
|
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. oilfield mat rental volume for the second quarter of 2005 totaled 3.3 million square feet
at an average price of $1.11 per square foot. This compares to 4.8 million square feet at an
average price of $1.04 per square foot in the second quarter of 2004. Our oilfield mat rental
pricing has continued to improve as a result of increased utilization of our mat inventory related
to reductions in available mat inventory and improvements in market activity. Re-rental revenues
increased by $1.4 million in the second quarter of 2005, compared to 2004, and fully offset the
decline in installation revenues.
Revenues from non-oilfield mat rentals, a premium margin market composed principally of
utility and infrastructure construction markets, declined slightly in the second quarter of 2005
compared to the year ago period. We continue to believe that this market has growth opportunities
due to increasing demand for electricity and the aging of our nations electrical power delivery
infrastructure.
During 2003 we changed our Canadian mat operations to principally a sales organization for
wooden and composite mats. All of the Canadian revenues for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004
were related to sales of wooden mats. The increase in wooden mat sales is principally due to
continued acceptance of matting systems in this market as a means to improve the operating
efficiency for our customers.
During the second quarter of 2005, we sold approximately 4,100 composite mats, resulting in
$5.5 million in revenues, compared to $9.4 million of revenue on approximately 5,500 mats sold in
the second quarter of 2004.
Operating Income
Mat and integrated services operating income declined $500,000 in the second quarter of 2005
on a $2.2 million decrease in revenues, compared to the second quarter of 2004. The decline in
operating income resulting from the revenue decline was partially offset by cost reduction measures
which began in 2004. We expect the remaining cost reductions will be realized in the second half
of 2005 as depreciation expense is completed on portions of our wooden mat fleet that we do not
intend to replace.
27
E&P Waste Disposal:
Revenues
Total revenue for this segment consists of the following for the three months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
E&P Waste Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
E&P Waste Non-Gulf Coast |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
NORM |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&P waste Gulf Coast revenues increased $1.0 million, or 10%, on a 4% decline in waste volumes
received. The average revenue per barrel in the Gulf Coast market increased 15% to $13.34, compared
to an average of $11.64 in 2004. During the second quarter of 2005, we received 812,000 barrels of
E&P waste in the Gulf Coast market, compared to 849,000 barrels in the comparable period in 2004.
The decline in volumes received, in spite of the increase in Gulf Coast rig activity, is related to
a temporary capacity reduction which began in the first quarter of 2005 related to changes in our
recycling processes. During this time, we lost some market share. With the process changes in
place, we are now back to full capacity and expect to see an increase in waste volumes received in
this market, as a result of improved market share and the recent improvement in activity,
particularly in the inland barge market.
The increase in Gulf Coast revenues was almost completely offset by a decrease in revenues
within the Wyoming and western Canadian market as resources and management focus were reallocated
to development of the new water treatment business.
Operating Income
Waste disposal operating income improved $600,000 in the second quarter of 2005 on an $800,000
increase in revenues, compared to the second quarter of 2004. The increase in operating income
reflects the high operating leverage in this segment, particularly for NORM operations.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense increased $200,000 to approximately $2.6 million in the
second quarter of 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. General and administrative expenses
as a percentage of revenues were 1.9% in the second quarter of 2005, compared to 2.3% in the second
quarter of 2004.
Foreign Currency Exchange Gains
Net foreign currency losses totaled $283,000 in the second quarter of 2005 compared to $34,000
in the second quarter of 2004. These losses were primarily associated with
28
strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar and the associated impact on
short-term intercompany payable balances of our Canadian operations.
Interest Income
Interest income totaled $55,000 in the second quarter of 2005, compared to $1.0 million in the
second quarter of 2004. During the second quarter of 2004 we collected the entire balance owed on
a fully-secured note receivable resulting from the 1996 sale of a former shipyard operation. The
payment included $823,000 of previously unaccrued interest related to the note receivable, which is
included in interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. We had ceased accrual on the note
receivable in January 2003 due to the financial condition of the operator.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased approximately $643,000 for the second quarter of 2005 compared to
the second quarter of 2004. This increase was principally due to an increase in average
outstanding debt and a 53 basis point increase in average interest rates, principally associated
with increases in variable rates over the period. The increase in debt outstanding includes a
$5.3 million increase related to the consolidation of our mat manufacturing operations as a result
of our purchase of the remaining 51% interest in these operations in the second quarter of 2005 and
a $4.2 million increase related to the assumption of a lease in January 2005 from a joint venture
which supplied a portion of our wooden mats. The remainder of the increase is related to funding
of working capital in our Mediterranean operations and funding of a portion of 2005 capital
expenditures.
Provision for Income Taxes
For the quarter ended June 30, 2005, we recorded an income tax provision of $2.7 million,
reflecting an income tax rate of 35.0%. For the quarter ended June 30, 2004, we recorded an income
tax provision of $1.0 million, reflecting an income tax rate of 38.5%. The lower effective rate in
the second quarter of 2005 reflects the impact of adjustments to previous tax accruals for prior
year returns based on final tax return results.
29
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Fluids Sales and Engineering:
Revenues
Total revenue by region for this segment was as follows for the three months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
76.0 |
|
|
$ |
47.0 |
|
|
$ |
29.0 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
U.S. Central |
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Other |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. |
|
|
147.4 |
|
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Canada |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Mediterranean |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
178.2 |
|
|
$ |
124.6 |
|
|
$ |
53.6 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average number of rigs we serviced in the U.S. market increased by 36%, from 141 in the
first six months of 2004 to 192 in the first six months of 2005. Our average annual revenue per
rig in the U.S. market increased by 12%, from approximately $1.4 million in the first six months of
2004 to approximately $1.5 million in the first six months of 2005.
Revenues in our primary Gulf Coast market for the first six months of 2005 were 62% higher
than in the prior year. In the Gulf Coast market we serviced an average of 77 rigs in the first
six months of 2005, compared to 50 in the first six months of 2004, an increase of 54%. The
average number of rigs operating in this region increased 17%, from 417 rigs for the first six
months of 2004 to 489 for the first six months of 2005. The difference between the increase in the
number of rigs we serviced in this region and the number of rigs active in the region reflects our
increased market penetration. We have significantly improved our key drilling fluid customer
relationships in this market and believe that those customers will be increasingly active in the
Gulf Coast market during the remainder of the year, though the total number of active rigs is not
expected to increase.
Revenues in the U.S. Central region for the first six months of 2005 were 35% higher than in
the prior year. In the U.S. Central region we serviced an average of 116 rigs in the first six
months of 2005, compared to 91 in the first six months of 2004, an increase of 27%. The average
number of rigs operating in this region increased 11%, from 453 rigs in the first six months of
2004 to 501 in the first six months of 2005. The difference between the increase in the number of
rigs we serviced in this region and the number of rigs active in the region reflects our market
penetration.
Revenues in the Canadian market increased 34% during the six months ended June 30, 2005,
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004, primarily due to the introduction of our New-100
oil-based drilling fluid system in the western Canadian market.
30
Revenues in the Mediterranean market remained relatively unchanged during the six months
ended June 30, 2005, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2004. During 2004, we focused the
management of these operations on improving margins rather than increasing revenues.
Operating Income
Operating income for this segment increased $7.6 million in the first six months of 2005 on a
$53.6 million increase in revenues, compared to the first six months of 2004. The operating margin
for this segment in the first six months of 2005 was 9.2%, compared to 7.1% in the first six months
of 2004. The increase in operating margin was principally attributable to operating leverage in
this segment.
The increase in operating margin for this segment was partially offset by increased barite
costs that have not been fully recovered through price increases to our customers. More favorable
transportation arrangements have helped to stabilize barite costs, and increases in pricing are
anticipated to recapture these costs in the second half of 2005. We anticipate an increase in the
number of deepwater rigs serviced in the Gulf of Mexico market during the remainder of 2005 which
should continue to improve margins in our Gulf Coast operations. In addition, we anticipate margin
improvements for our New-100 fluid system sold in Canada as this product gains market acceptance.
Mat and Integrated Services:
Revenues
Total revenue for this segment consists of the following for the six months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
Installation |
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Re-rental |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. oilfield mat rental |
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Non-oilfield mat rental |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Integrated services and other |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Canadian mat sales |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Composite mat sales |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
61.0 |
|
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. oilfield mat rental volume for the first six months of 2005 totaled 7.6 million
square feet at an average price of $1.12 per square foot. This compares to 9.2 million square feet
at an average price of $0.95 per square foot in the first six months of 2004. Our oilfield mat
rental pricing has continued to improve as a result of increased utilization of our mat inventory
related to reductions in available mat inventory and improvements in market activity. Re-rental
revenues increased by $2.3 million in the first six months of 2005, compared to 2004, reflecting an
increase in the number of larger installations in 2005.
31
Revenues from non-oilfield mat rentals, a premium margin market composed principally of
seasonal utility and infrastructure construction markets, more than tripled to $4.1 million in the
first six months of 2005, compared to $1.3 million in the year ago period. Most of this increase
occurred in the first quarter of 2005. We continue to believe that this market has growth
opportunities due to increasing demand for electricity and the aging of our nations electrical
power delivery infrastructure.
Canadian revenues for the first six months of 2005 and 2004 were related to sales of wooden
mats. The increase in wooden mat sales is principally due to the unusually early break-up in
Western Canada and continued acceptance of matting systems in this market as a means to improve the
operating efficiency for our customers.
During the first six months of 2005, we sold approximately 8,000 composite mats, resulting in
$11.9 million in revenues, compared to $12.3 million of revenue on approximately 7,700 mats sold in
the first six months of 2004.
Operating Income
Mat and integrated services operating income improved $5.7 million in the first six months of
2005 on an $8.9 million increase in revenues, compared to the first six months of 2004. The
significant increase in operating income reflects the impact of increased non-oilfield rentals, the
benefit of cost reductions which began in 2004 and the impact of continued improvement in pricing
for our oilfield mat rental market.
E&P Waste Disposal:
Revenues
Total revenue for this segment consists of the following for the six months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
E&P Waste Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
E&P Waste Non-Gulf Coast |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
NORM |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
31.3 |
|
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&P waste Gulf Coast revenues increased $1.4 million, or 7%, on a 4% decline in waste volumes
received. The average revenue per barrel in the Gulf Coast market increased 11% to $13.12,
compared to an average of $11.87 in 2004. During the first six months of 2005, we received
1,584,000 barrels of E&P waste in the Gulf Coast market, compared to 1,653,000 barrels in the
comparable period in 2004. The decline in volumes received, in spite of the increase in Gulf Coast
rig activity, is related to a temporary capacity reduction which began in the first quarter of 2005
related to changes in our recycling processes. During this time, we lost some market share. With
the process changes in place, we are now back to full capacity and expect to see an increase in
waste volumes received in this market, as a result of improved market share and the recent
improvement in activity, particularly in the inland barge market.
32
The increase in Gulf Coast revenues was more than offset by lower revenues from the Wyoming
and western Canadian market as resources and management focus were reallocated to development of
the new water treatment business.
Operating Income
Waste disposal operating income declined $800,000 in the first six months of 2005 on a $1.0
million decrease in revenues, compared to the first six months of 2004. The decline in operating
income reflects the high operating leverage in this segment.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense decreased $171,000 to approximately $4.7 million in the
first six months of 2005, compared to the same period in 2004. The decrease is principally
associated with a reduction in legal costs due to the settlement of certain litigation in the
second half of 2004. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 1.7% in
the first six months of 2005, compared to 2.3% in the comparable period of 2004.
Foreign Currency Exchange Gains
Net foreign currency losses totaled $9,000 in the first six months of 2005 compared to net
foreign currency losses of $142,000 in the first six months of 2004. These losses were primarily
associated with strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar and the associated
impact on short-term intercompany payable balances of our Canadian operations.
Interest Income
Interest income totaled $124,000 in the first six months of 2005, compared to $1.1 million in
the first six months of 2004. During the second quarter of 2004 we collected the entire balance
owed on a note receivable resulting from the 1996 sale of a former shipyard operation. The payment
included $823,000 of previously unaccrued interest related to the note receivable, which is
included in interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2004. We had ceased accrual on the
note receivable in January 2003 due to the financial condition of the operator.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased approximately $1.2 million for the first six months of 2005
compared to the first six months of 2004. This increase was principally due to an increase in
average outstanding debt and a 42 basis point increase in average interest rates due to the
continued increase in variable rates during 2004 and early 2005. The increase in debt outstanding
includes a $5.3 million increase related to the consolidation of our mat manufacturing operations
as a result of our purchase of the remaining 51% interest in these operations in the second quarter
of 2005 and a $4.2 million increase related to the assumption of a lease in January 2005 from a
joint venture which supplied a portion of our wooden mats. The remainder of the increase is
related to funding of working
33
capital in our Mediterranean operations and funding of a portion of 2005 capital expenditures.
Provision for Income Taxes
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we recorded an income tax provision of $5.7 million,
reflecting an income tax rate of 36.1%. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded an
income tax provision of $2.0 million, reflecting an income tax rate of 38.0%. The lower effective
rate in 2005 reflects the impact of adjustments to previous tax accruals for prior year returns
based on final tax return results.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our working capital position was as follows at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Working Capital (000s) |
|
$ |
147,480 |
|
|
$ |
146,005 |
|
Current Ratio |
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
During the first six months of 2005, our working capital position improved by $1.5 million.
Net trade accounts receivable increased $17.8 million during the first six months of 2005 on a
$27.8 million increase in revenues from the fourth quarter of 2004. For the quarter ended June 30,
2005, days sales in receivables declined by 5 days to 76 days, from 81 days in the fourth quarter
of 2004. Partially offsetting the increase in accounts receivable was the $3.2 million reduction
in inventories, primarily related to composite mat sales.
We anticipate that our working capital requirements for 2005 will increase with the growth in
revenue that we are experiencing. Some of the increase in working capital requirements should be
offset by our continued focus on improving our collection cycle. However, we have the ability to
supplement our operating cash flows with borrowings under our credit facility to fund the expected
increase in working capital. We believe we have adequate capacity under our credit facility to
meet these anticipated working capital needs.
Cash generated from operations during the first six months of 2005 totaled $19.3 million. This
cash, along with increased borrowings on lines of credit of $4.6 million, was used principally to
fund net capital expenditures of $20.0 million. Capital expenditures within our established
business segments totaled $14.8 million, compared to $12.7 million in depreciation. We also
invested $5.2 million in the first six months of 2005 for acquisition of the first two water
treatment systems and construction of related facilities. We anticipate that, except for
acquisition costs of the water treatment systems and related facilities, 2005 capital expenditures
will approximate 2005 depreciation and that we will fund capital expenditures with cash generated
from operations.
34
Our long term capitalization was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior subordinated notes |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
Credit facility |
|
|
41,339 |
|
|
|
39,633 |
|
Barite facilities financing |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
13,229 |
|
Loma financing |
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, primarily mat financing |
|
|
11,013 |
|
|
|
8,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
193,372 |
|
|
|
186,286 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
332,365 |
|
|
|
322,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
$ |
525,737 |
|
|
$ |
509,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt to long-term capitalization |
|
|
36.8 |
% |
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Senior Subordinated Notes accrue interest at the rate of 8 5/8%, require semi-annual
interest payments and mature on December 15, 2007.
On February 25, 2004, we converted our bank credit facility into an asset-based lending
facility (the Credit Facility) that is secured by substantially all of our domestic assets and
the assets of our domestic subsidiaries. The Credit Facility matures on February 25, 2007. Under
the Credit Facility, we can borrow up to $15 million in term debt and $70 million in revolving
debt, for a total of $85 million. At June 30, 2005, $10.3 million was outstanding under the term
portion of the Credit Facility. Eligibility under the revolving portion of the Credit Facility is
based on a percentage of our eligible consolidated accounts receivable and inventory, as defined in
the Credit Facility. At June 30, 2005, the maximum amount we could borrow under the revolving
portion of the Credit Facility was $61.8 million. At June 30, 2005, $8.1 million in letters of
credit were issued and outstanding and $31.0 million was outstanding under the revolving portion of
the Credit Facility, leaving $22.7 million of availability at that date. The Credit Facility bears
interest at either a specified prime rate (6.25% at June 30, 2005), or the LIBOR rate (3.49% at
June 30, 2005), in each case plus a spread determined quarterly based upon a fixed charge coverage
ratio. The weighted average interest rates on the outstanding balances under the credit facilities
for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 6.54% and 4.29%, respectively. The weighted
average interest rates on the outstanding balances under the credit facilities for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 6.37% and 4.67%, respectively.
The Barite Facilities Financing is a $15 million term loan facility that bears interest at
one-month LIBOR plus 3.75% (6.86% at June 30, 2005) payable monthly, and matures August 1, 2009.
Principal payments are required monthly based on an amortization period of 12 years, with a balloon
payment at the maturity date. The Barite Facilities Financing is collateralized by our four barite
facilities. At June 30, 2005, $13.8 million was outstanding under this agreement.
35
The Credit Facility and the Barite Facilities Financing contain a fixed charge coverage ratio
covenant and a tangible net worth covenant. As of June 30, 2005, we were in compliance with the
covenants contained in these facilities, as amended. The Notes do not contain any financial
covenants; however, if we do not meet the financial covenants of the Credit Facility and are unable
to obtain an amendment from the banks, we would be in default of the Credit Facility which would
cause the Notes to be in default and immediately due. The Notes, the Credit Facility and the
certificate of designation relating to our preferred stock also contain covenants that
significantly limit the payment of dividends on our common stock.
In June 2005 we entered into a secured financing facility which provides $8 million in
financing for wooden mat additions. At June 30, 2005, we had borrowed $4.7 million under the
facility. Principal payments totaling approximately $97,000 are required monthly for 48 months.
Interest based on one-month LIBOR plus 3.45% is also payable monthly.
Ava, S.p.A (Ava), our European drilling fluids subsidiary maintains its own credit
arrangements, consisting primarily of lines of credit with several banks, with the lines renewed on
an annual basis. Advances under these credit arrangements are typically based on a percentage of
Avas accounts receivable or firm contracts with certain customers. The weighted average interest
rate under these arrangements was approximately 5.9% at June 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, Ava
had a total of $10.4 million outstanding under these facilities. We do not provide a corporate
guaranty of Avas debt.
At December 31, 2004, we had issued a guarantee for certain lease obligations of a joint
venture which supplied a portion of our wooden mats on a day rate leasing basis (MOCTX). The
amount of this guarantee as of December 31, 2004 was $4.2 million. In January 2005, MOCTX was
dissolved and we took possession of the underlying assets and assumed the obligations under the
leases. We recorded these leases as capital leases in accordance with FAS 13. At June 30, 2005,
$3.0 million was outstanding under these capital leases.
On April 18, 2005, we acquired OLS Consulting Services, Inc. (OLS) in exchange for a cash
payment of $1.3 million. We also incurred direct acquisition costs of approximately $57,000. The
principal assets of OLS included patents licensed to The Loma Company, LLC (LOMA), the
manufacturer or our composite mats, for use in the manufacture of composite mats, a note receivable
from LOMA and OLS 51% membership interest in LOMA. As a result of the acquisition of OLS, through
two of our subsidiaries, we also own 100% of LOMA and have consolidated the balance sheet and
results of operations of LOMA with our financial statements. The effect on our consolidated
balance sheet was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
467 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
15,633 |
|
Intangible assets patents (1018 year lives) |
|
|
4,534 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Current and long-term debt |
|
|
(5,284 |
) |
Payable to Newpark |
|
|
(14,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash purchase price, net of settlement expense of $400,000 and
net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
In consolidation, the payable to Newpark was eliminated primarily against other assets.
At June 30, 2005, we had issued a $5.4 million guarantee of certain debt obligations of LOMA
supported by a letter of credit issued under the Credit Facility. These underlying debt
obligations of LOMA require monthly escrow payments of principal of $147,000, interest and letter
of credit fees payable monthly based on a variable rate, which approximated 6.1% at June 30, 2005,
and mature in December 2008. Beginning in September 2004 and during the course of the LOMA
bankruptcy proceedings, we made debt service payments on behalf of LOMA in connection with our
guarantee that totaled approximately $2.0 million through the date of the acquisition and are
included in the intercompany liability balance noted above. Since our guarantee is secured by a
letter of credit and declines with each payment, availability under our Credit Facility has not
been impacted by debt service payments made to date and will not be impacted by future payments. We
are presently working with the Credit Facility lenders to refinance LOMAs debt obligations and
expect this refinancing to be completed by the end of the third quarter of 2005.
With respect to additional off-balance sheet liabilities, we lease most of our office and
warehouse space, rolling stock and certain pieces of operating equipment under operating leases.
Except as described in the preceding paragraphs, we are not aware of any material
expenditures, significant balloon payments or other payments on long-term obligations or any other
demands or commitments, including off-balance sheet items to be incurred within the next 12 months.
Inflation has not materially impacted our revenues or income.
Critical Accounting Policies.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles, which requires us to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that
affect the amounts reported. We periodically evaluate our estimates and judgments related to
uncollectible accounts and notes receivable, inventory, customer returns, impairments of long-lived
assets, including goodwill and other intangibles and our valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets. Our estimates are based on historical experience and on our future expectations that we
believe to be reasonable. The combination of these factors forms the basis for making judgments
about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from our current estimates and those differences may be
material.
For additional discussion of our critical accounting policies, see Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our critical accounting policies have not changed
materially since December 31, 2004.
New Accounting Standards.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FAS 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment, (FAS 123(R)) which is a revision of FAS 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. FAS 123(R) supersedes Accounting
37
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
amends FAS 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in FAS 123(R) is similar to the
approach described in FAS 123. However, FAS 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the income statement based
on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. FAS 123(R) permits
adoption of its requirements using one of two methods: (1) a modified prospective method in
which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date of FAS 123(R) (a) based on
the requirement of FAS 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b)
based on the requirements of FAS 123 for all awards granted prior to the effective date of FAS
123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date; and (2) a modified retrospective method which
includes the requirements of the modified prospective method previously described, but also permits
restatement of prior periods based on the amounts previously reported in pro forma disclosures
under FAS 123. We currently plan to adopt FAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method and to
continue using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of our stock
options. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced amended compliance
dates for FAS 123(R) and the new rules now require that we adopt FAS 123(R) starting with our first
quarter of our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006.
As permitted by FAS 123, we currently account for stock-based compensation using Accounting
Principles Board (APB) 25s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognize no
compensation cost for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of FAS 123(R) may have a
material impact on our results of operations. However, we cannot predict the ultimate impact of
adoption of FAS 123(R) at this time because the impact will depend on levels of share-based
payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted FAS 123(R) in prior periods, the impact
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, would have approximated the
impact of FAS 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in
Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2004, the FASB issued FAS 151, Inventory Costs-an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs and wasted material (spoilage). FAS 151 requires that these items be recognized as
current-period charges regardless of whether they meet a criterion of so abnormal. FAS 151 is
effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We have
not yet determined the impact that adoption of FAS 151 will have on Newparks financial results.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and changes in foreign currency
rates. We do not believe that we have a material exposure to market risk. Historically, we have not
entered into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce market risk or for
speculative purposes. However, during the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we did enter into a
foreign currency forward contract arrangement. A discussion of our primary market risk exposure in
financial instruments as well as the foreign currency forward contract is presented below.
38
Interest Rate Risk
Our policy has historically been to manage exposure to interest rate fluctuations by using a
combination of fixed and variable-rate debt. At June 30, 2005, we had total debt outstanding of
$213.9 million, of which $125 million, or 58%, relates to our Senior Subordinated Notes (the
Notes), which bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.625%. The remaining $88.9 million of debt
outstanding at June 30, 2005 bears interest at a floating rate. At June 30, 2005, the weighted
average interest rate under our floating-rate debt was approximately 6.3%. Assuming a 200 basis
point increase in market interest rates during 2005, our annual interest expense would increase
approximately $1.1 million, net of taxes, resulting in a $0.01 per diluted share reduction in
annual earnings.
The Notes mature on December 15, 2007. There are no scheduled principal payments under the
Notes prior to the maturity date. However, all or some of the Notes may be redeemed at a premium
after December 15, 2002. We have no current plans to repay the Notes ahead of their scheduled
maturity.
Foreign Currency
Our principal foreign operations are conducted in Canada and in areas surrounding the
Mediterranean Sea. We have foreign currency exchange risks associated with these operations, which
are principally conducted in the functional currency of the jurisdictions in which we operate.
Historically, we have not used off-balance sheet financial hedging instruments to manage foreign
currency risks when we enter into a transaction denominated in a currency other than our local
currencies because the dollar amount of these transactions has not warranted our using hedging
instruments. However, during the quarter ended March 31, 2005, our Canadian subsidiary committed
to purchase approximately $2.0 million of barite from one of our U.S. subsidiaries and we entered
into a foreign currency forward contract arrangement to reduce the exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations related to this commitment. The forward contract requires that the Canadian
subsidiary purchase approximately $2.0 million U.S. dollars at a contracted exchange rate of 1.2496
over a two year period. At June 30, 2005, the fair value of this forward contract represents a
loss of approximately $40,000.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we reported foreign currency losses of
$283,000 and $9,000, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we
reported foreign currency losses of $34,000 and $142,000, respectively. These transactional losses
were primarily due to exchange rate fluctuations related to monetary asset balances denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency, including intercompany advances which are deemed to
be short-term in nature. We estimate that a hypothetical 10% movement of all applicable foreign
currency exchange rates would affect annual earnings by approximately $500,000, due to the
revaluing of these monetary assets and intercompany balances.
Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated using the exchange rates in
effect at the balance sheet date, resulting in translation adjustments that are reflected in
accumulated other comprehensive loss in the stockholders equity section of our balance sheet.
Included in comprehensive income are translation losses of $1.7 million and $2.3 million for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively. Included in comprehensive income
are translation losses of $1.7 million and $2.5 million
39
for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, respectively. As of June 30, 2005,
net assets of foreign subsidiaries included in our consolidated balance sheet totaled $35.0
million. We estimate that a hypothetical 10% movement of all applicable foreign currency exchange
rates would affect other comprehensive income by approximately $3.5 million.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, net accounts receivable, accounts payable and
variable rate debt approximated book value at June 30, 2005. The fair value of the 8.625% Notes
totaled $123.3 million at June 30, 2005. The fair value of the Notes has been estimated based on
quotes from the lead broker.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, with the participation of management,
have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on their evaluation, they have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (1) are effective in timely alerting them to
material information relating to Newpark (including our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be
disclosed in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and (2) are adequate
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or furnished by us
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed and summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Security and Exchange
Commission. It should be noted that in designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and
procedures, our management recognized that any control or procedure, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives,
and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures. We have designed our disclosure controls and
procedures to reach a level of reasonable assurance of achieving the desired objectives and, based
on the evaluation described above, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q were effective at reaching that level of reasonable assurance.
There were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in
other factors that could significantly affect these controls during our most recently completed
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
The information set forth in Note 10, Legal Matters, to our consolidated financial statements
included in this report is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.
40
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
(a) |
|
Newpark held an Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 8, 2005. |
|
|
(b) |
|
The following eight directors were elected at that meeting to serve until the
next Annual Stockholders Meeting, with the following votes cast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
William Thomas Ballantine |
|
|
75,474,061 |
|
|
|
1,746,431 |
|
Jerry W. Box |
|
|
75,502,462 |
|
|
|
1,718,030 |
|
James D. Cole |
|
|
75,453,176 |
|
|
|
1,767,316 |
|
David P. Hunt |
|
|
75,256,687 |
|
|
|
1,963,805 |
|
Alan Kaufman |
|
|
74,066,196 |
|
|
|
3,154,296 |
|
James H. Stone |
|
|
75,245,141 |
|
|
|
1,975,351 |
|
Roger C. Stull |
|
|
76,356,015 |
|
|
|
864,477 |
|
F. Walker Tucei, Jr. |
|
|
75,330,560 |
|
|
|
1,889,932 |
|
|
(c) |
|
Stockholders ratified the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent
auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 with the following votes cast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
|
|
76,358,225 |
|
|
|
833,085 |
|
ITEM 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of James D. Cole pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Matthew W. Hardey pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of James D. Cole pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Matthew W. Hardey pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
41
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 3, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James D. Cole
|
|
|
|
James D. Cole, |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Matthew W. Hardey
|
|
|
|
Matthew W. Hardey, |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
42
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of James D. Cole pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Matthew W. Hardey pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of James D. Cole pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Matthew W. Hardey pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
43
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, James D. Cole, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Newpark Resources, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005 |
/s/ James D. Cole
|
|
|
James D. Cole, Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Matthew W. Hardey, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Newpark Resources, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005 |
/s/ Matthew W. Hardey
|
|
|
Matthew W. Hardey, Vice President of Finance |
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Newpark Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. Cole, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005 |
/s/ James D. Cole
|
|
|
James D. Cole, |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Newpark Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew W. Hardey, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 3, 2005 |
/s/ Matthew W. Hardey
|
|
|
Matthew W. Hardey, Vice President of Finance and |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.